[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ea9d91e8ec94edda19bd57e835e0a79@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 13:28:00 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Ping-Ke Shih' <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
You Kangren <youkangren@...o.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"open list:MAC80211" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "opensource.kernel@...o.com" <opensource.kernel@...o.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] wifi:mac80211: Replace the ternary conditional operator with max()
From: Ping-Ke Shih
> Sent: 28 June 2023 02:49
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: You Kangren <youkangren@...o.com>
> > Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 6:48 PM
> > To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>; David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric Dumazet
> > <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>; open
> > list:MAC80211 <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>; open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]
> <netdev@...r.kernel.org>;
> > open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> > Cc: opensource.kernel@...o.com; youkangren@...o.com
> > Subject: [PATCH] wifi:mac80211: Replace the ternary conditional operator with max()
>
> The semicolon of "wifi:" is different from others.
>
> >
> > Replace the ternary conditional operator with max() to make the code clean
> >
> > Signed-off-by: You Kangren <youkangren@...o.com>
> > ---
> > net/mac80211/tdls.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/mac80211/tdls.c b/net/mac80211/tdls.c
> > index a4af3b7675ef..9f8b0842a616 100644
> > --- a/net/mac80211/tdls.c
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/tdls.c
> > @@ -946,7 +946,7 @@ ieee80211_tdls_build_mgmt_packet_data(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
> > int ret;
> > struct ieee80211_link_data *link;
> >
> > - link_id = link_id >= 0 ? link_id : 0;
> > + link_id = max(link_id, 0);
>
> Original logic means "if link_id < 0, then use default link (0)" instead of
> "always use link_id larger than or equal to 0". So, I think max(link_id, 0) could
> cause misunderstanding.
The clearest is probably:
if (link_id < 0)
link_id = 0;
The compiler could easily generate the same code (compare and conditional
move).
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists