linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 01/11] dt-bindings: dma: Add support for SM6115 and QCM2290 SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f14c00e4-d0d2-17cd-da8c-5632558f53b9@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 30 Jun 2023 14:00:00 +0530
From:   Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        andersson@...nel.org, bhupesh.linux@...il.com,
        krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org,
        rfoss@...nel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, djakov@...nel.org,
        stephan@...hold.net, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/11] dt-bindings: dma: Add support for SM6115 and
 QCM2290 SoCs

On 6/8/23 6:02 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 29-05-23, 11:43, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>> Hi Vinod,
>>
>>> On Sat, 27 May 2023 at 00:52, Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Add new compatible for BAM DMA engine version v1.7.4 which is
>>> found on Qualcomm SM6115 and QCM2290 SoCs. Since its very similar
>>> to v1.7.0 used on SM8150 like SoCs, mark the comptible scheme
>>> accordingly.
>>>
>>> While at it, also update qcom,bam-dma bindings to add comments
>>> which describe the BAM DMA versions used in SM8150 and SM8250 SoCs.
>>> This provides an easy reference for identifying the actual BAM DMA
>>> version available on Qualcomm SoCs.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>> Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
>>> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml | 20 ++++++++++++-------
>>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml
>>> index f1ddcf672261..c663b6102f50 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/qcom,bam-dma.yaml
>>> @@ -15,13 +15,19 @@ allOf:
>>>
>>>   properties:
>>>     compatible:
>>> -    enum:
>>> -        # APQ8064, IPQ8064 and MSM8960
>>> -      - qcom,bam-v1.3.0
>>> -        # MSM8974, APQ8074 and APQ8084
>>> -      - qcom,bam-v1.4.0
>>> -        # MSM8916 and SDM845
>>> -      - qcom,bam-v1.7.0
>>> +    oneOf:
>>> +      - enum:
>>> +          # APQ8064, IPQ8064 and MSM8960
>>> +          - qcom,bam-v1.3.0
>>> +          # MSM8974, APQ8074 and APQ8084
>>> +          - qcom,bam-v1.4.0
>>> +          # MSM8916, SDM630
>>> +          - qcom,bam-v1.7.0
>>> +      - items:
>>> +          - enum:
>>> +              # SDM845, SM6115, SM8150, SM8250 and QCM2290
>>> +              - qcom,bam-v1.7.4
>>> +          - const: qcom,bam-v1.7.0
>>>
>>>     clocks:
>>>       maxItems: 1
>>> --
>>> 2.38.1
>>
>> Bjorn has applied the dts patches from this series to his tree.
>> As suggested by him, can you please pick patches [PATCH 1/11] and
>> [PATCH 2/11] from this series via the 'dmaengine' tree.
> 
> I dont have this series in my inbox or dmaengine pw
> 
>> Seems some Cc fields got messed up while sending the patchset, so
>> Cc'ing the dmaengine list again.
> 
> not just list but mine too..
> 
> Please rebase and resend

Sure, I have sent a v9, which can be seen here: 
<https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230630082230.2264698-1-bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org/>
Please help review.

Thanks,
Bhupesh