[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b941cd7-1fb7-404d-a329-b831d20ce3de@t-8ch.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 10:50:57 +0200
From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>
To: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@...ylab.org>
Cc: w@....eu, arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] allow run with minimal kernel config
On 2023-06-30 07:22:39+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> Willy, Thomas
>
> This is v2 to allow run with minimal kernel config, see v1 [1].
>
> It mainly applied the suggestions from Thomas. It is based on our
> previous v5 sysret helper series [2] and Thomas' chmod_net removal
> patchset [3].
>
> Now, a test report on arm/vexpress-a9 without procfs, shmem, tmpfs, net
> and memfd_create looks like:
>
> LOG: testing report for arm/vexpress-a9:
>
> 14 chmod_net [SKIPPED]
Shouldn't this be gone?
> 15 chmod_self [SKIPPED]
> 17 chown_self [SKIPPED]
> 41 link_cross [SKIPPED]
> 0 -fstackprotector not supported [SKIPPED]
>
> 139 test(s) passed, 5 skipped, 0 failed.
> See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log
>
> LOG: testing summary:
>
> arch/board | result
> ------------|------------
> arm/vexpress-a9 | 139 test(s) passed, 5 skipped, 0 failed. See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log
> [..]
> tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 22 ++++
> tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 102 +++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
A few nitpicks left, mentioned on the patches themselves.
In general: for the full series.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists