[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <58662E98-81B0-4553-9A75-4CA033720BE3@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 19:02:32 +0530
From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, bp@...en8.de,
npiggin@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Introduce SMT level and add PowerPC support
> On 29-Jun-2023, at 8:01 PM, Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I'm taking over the series Michael sent previously [1] which is smartly
> reviewing the initial series I sent [2]. This series is addressing the
> comments sent by Thomas and me on the Michael's one.
>
> Here is a short introduction to the issue this series is addressing:
>
> When a new CPU is added, the kernel is activating all its threads. This
> leads to weird, but functional, result when adding CPU on a SMT 4 system
> for instance.
>
> Here the newly added CPU 1 has 8 threads while the other one has 4 threads
> active (system has been booted with the 'smt-enabled=4' kernel option):
>
> ltcden3-lp12:~ # ppc64_cpu --info
> Core 0: 0* 1* 2* 3* 4 5 6 7
> Core 1: 8* 9* 10* 11* 12* 13* 14* 15*
>
> This mixed SMT level may confused end users and/or some applications.
>
> There is no SMT level recorded in the kernel (common code), neither in user
> space, as far as I know. Such a level is helpful when adding new CPU or
> when optimizing the energy efficiency (when reactivating CPUs).
>
> When SMP and HOTPLUG_SMT are defined, this series is adding a new SMT level
> (cpu_smt_num_threads) and few callbacks allowing the architecture code to
> fine control this value, setting a max and a "at boot" level, and
> controling whether a thread should be onlined or not.
>
> v3:
> Fix a build error in the patch 6/9
Successfully tested the V3 version on a Power10 LPAR. Add/remove of
processor core worked correctly, preserving the SMT level (on a kernel
booted with smt-enabled= parameter)
Laurent (Thanks!) also provided a patch to update the ppc64_cpu &
lparstat utility. With patched ppc64_cpu utility verified that SMT level
changed at runtime was preserved across processor core add (on
a kernel booted without smt-enabled= parameter)
Based on these test results
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.ibm.com>
- Sachin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists