[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230630184833.o3lgqrtqzzwgb7nk@mercury.elektranox.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 20:48:33 +0200
From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...labora.com,
Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>,
Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/14] mfd: rk808: split into core and i2c
Hi Geert,
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 01:34:44PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > @@ -1183,12 +1183,17 @@ config MFD_RC5T583
> > Additional drivers must be enabled in order to use the
> > different functionality of the device.
> >
> > -config MFD_RK808
> > +config MFD_RK8XX
> > + bool
>
> Is there any specific reason why this cannot be modular, like most (all?)
> of its users that select it?
I don't remember why I made that bool. Tristate should be perfectly
fine. Do you want to send a patch (I will test it of course), or should
I take care of it?
Greetings and thanks for the report,
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists