[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230704192107.2944-1-zeming@nfschina.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 03:21:07 +0800
From: Li zeming <zeming@...china.com>
To: naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, mhiramat@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Li zeming <zeming@...china.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kprobes: Remove unnecessary ‘0’ values from ret
ret is assigned first, so it does not need to initialize the assignment.
Signed-off-by: Li zeming <zeming@...china.com>
---
kernel/kprobes.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 00e177de91cc..db8a3aa53cf6 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -1072,7 +1072,7 @@ static int kprobe_ftrace_enabled;
static int __arm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p, struct ftrace_ops *ops,
int *cnt)
{
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
lockdep_assert_held(&kprobe_mutex);
@@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ static int arm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p)
static int __disarm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p, struct ftrace_ops *ops,
int *cnt)
{
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
lockdep_assert_held(&kprobe_mutex);
--
2.18.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists