[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230706223710.58284736311727766cee345a@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 22:37:10 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Li zeming <zeming@...china.com>
Cc: naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Remove unnecessary ‘0’
values from ret
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 03:21:07 +0800
Li zeming <zeming@...china.com> wrote:
> ret is assigned first, so it does not need to initialize the assignment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li zeming <zeming@...china.com>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Thank you!
> ---
> kernel/kprobes.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index 00e177de91cc..db8a3aa53cf6 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -1072,7 +1072,7 @@ static int kprobe_ftrace_enabled;
> static int __arm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p, struct ftrace_ops *ops,
> int *cnt)
> {
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&kprobe_mutex);
>
> @@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ static int arm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p)
> static int __disarm_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p, struct ftrace_ops *ops,
> int *cnt)
> {
> - int ret = 0;
> + int ret;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&kprobe_mutex);
>
> --
> 2.18.2
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists