linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] blk-mq: improve tag fair sharing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <82d44ba1-4389-079c-935a-cbb49203ca27@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jul 2023 21:29:08 +0800
From:   Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] blk-mq: improve tag fair sharing

Hi, Christoph and Jens and anyone who's interested

在 2023/06/20 23:20, Bart Van Assche 写道:
> On 6/18/23 09:07, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> This is not a formal version and not fully tested, I send this RFC
>> because I want to make sure if people think doing this is meaningful,
>> before I spend too much time on this.
> The approach looks good to me but I'd like to hear from Jens and 
> Christoph what their opinion is about the approach of this patch series 
> before doing an in-depth review.
> 
Any suggestions on this topic? It'll be great to hear that if anyone
thinks it's meaningful to refactor tag fair sharing.

Thanks,
Kuai
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
> 
> .
>