lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4de836a-a2a1-847f-1525-1accb814e45e@acm.org>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jul 2023 11:08:13 -0700
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] blk-mq: improve tag fair sharing

On 7/3/23 06:29, Yu Kuai wrote:
> 在 2023/06/20 23:20, Bart Van Assche 写道:
>> On 6/18/23 09:07, Yu Kuai wrote:
>>> This is not a formal version and not fully tested, I send this RFC
>>> because I want to make sure if people think doing this is meaningful,
>>> before I spend too much time on this.
>> The approach looks good to me but I'd like to hear from Jens and 
>> Christoph what their opinion is about the approach of this patch 
>> series before doing an in-depth review.
>>
> Any suggestions on this topic? It'll be great to hear that if anyone
> thinks it's meaningful to refactor tag fair sharing.

The cover letter of this patch series says "This is not a formal version 
and not fully tested". If a fully tested version will be posted, I will 
help with an in-depth review.

Thanks,

Bart.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ