lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 04 Jul 2023 04:22:17 -0300
From:   Leonardo Brás <leobras@...hat.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Move usages of struct __call_single_data to
 call_single_data_t

On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 00:51 -0300, Leonardo Bras Soares Passos wrote:
> Friendly ping
> 
> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 2:30 AM Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Changes since RFCv1:
> > - request->csd moved to the middle of the struct, without size impact
> > - type change happens in a different patch (thanks Jens Axboe!)
> > - Improved the third patch to also update the .h file.
> > 
> > Leonardo Bras (3):
> >   blk-mq: Move csd inside struct request so it's 32-byte aligned
> >   blk-mq: Change request->csd type to call_single_data_t
> >   smp: Change signatures to use call_single_data_t
> > 
> >  include/linux/blk-mq.h | 10 +++++-----
> >  include/linux/smp.h    |  2 +-
> >  kernel/smp.c           |  4 ++--
> >  kernel/up.c            |  2 +-
> >  4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --
> > 2.40.1
> > 

Hello Jens,

I still want your feedback on this series :)

I think I addressed every issue of RFCv1, but if you have any other feedback,
please let me know.

Thanks!
Leo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ