lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230704083206.693155-2-davidgow@google.com>
Date:   Tue,  4 Jul 2023 16:32:07 +0800
From:   David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@...il.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: checksum: Fix unaligned checksums on < i686

The checksum_32 code was originally written to only handle 2-byte
aligned buffers, but was later extended to support arbitrary alignment.
However, the non-PPro variant doesn't apply the carry before jumping to
the 2- or 4-byte aligned versions, which clear CF.

This causes the new checksum_kunit test to fail, as it runs with a large
number of different possible alignments and both with and without
carries.

For example:
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch i386 --kconfig_add CONFIG_M486=y checksum
Gives:
    KTAP version 1
    # Subtest: checksum
    1..3
    ok 1 test_csum_fixed_random_inputs
    # test_csum_all_carry_inputs: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:267
    Expected result == expec, but
        result == 65281 (0xff01)
        expec == 65280 (0xff00)
    not ok 2 test_csum_all_carry_inputs
    # test_csum_no_carry_inputs: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:314
    Expected result == expec, but
        result == 65535 (0xffff)
        expec == 65534 (0xfffe)
    not ok 3 test_csum_no_carry_inputs

With this patch, it passes.
    KTAP version 1
    # Subtest: checksum
    1..3
    ok 1 test_csum_fixed_random_inputs
    ok 2 test_csum_all_carry_inputs
    ok 3 test_csum_no_carry_inputs

I also tested it on a real 486DX2, with the same results.

Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
---

This is a follow-up to the UML patch to use the common 32-bit x86
checksum implementations:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-um/20230704083022.692368-2-davidgow@google.com/

---
 arch/x86/lib/checksum_32.S | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/checksum_32.S b/arch/x86/lib/checksum_32.S
index 23318c338db0..128287cea42d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/checksum_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/checksum_32.S
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(csum_partial)
 	jl 8f
 	movzbl (%esi), %ebx
 	adcl %ebx, %eax
+	adcl $0, %eax
 	roll $8, %eax
 	inc %esi
 	testl $2, %esi
-- 
2.41.0.255.g8b1d071c50-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ