[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230704092841.2e71a21ee1149ec662c73744@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 09:28:41 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bootmem: remove the vmemmap pages from kmemleak in
free_bootmem_page
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 18:19:42 +0800 Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com> wrote:
> commit dd0ff4d12dd2 ("bootmem: remove the vmemmap pages from kmemleak in
> put_page_bootmem") fix an overlaps existing problem of kmemleak. But the
> problem still existed when HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE is disabled, because in
> this case, free_bootmem_page() will call free_reserved_page() directly.
So I take it that with CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE=n, the issue
described in dd0ff4d12dd2 still occurs? That kmemleak reports an error
and stops working?
So we want a cc:stable on this fix, yes?
> Fix the problem by adding kmemleak_free_part() in free_bootmem_page()
> when HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE is disabled.
>
> Fixes: f41f2ed43ca5 ("mm: hugetlb: free the vmemmap pages associated with each HugeTLB page")
> ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists