linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] bootmem: remove the vmemmap pages from kmemleak in free_bootmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Jul 2023 09:17:42 +0800
From:   Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bootmem: remove the vmemmap pages from kmemleak in
 free_bootmem_page



On 2023/7/5 0:28, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 18:19:42 +0800 Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> commit dd0ff4d12dd2 ("bootmem: remove the vmemmap pages from kmemleak in
>> put_page_bootmem") fix an overlaps existing problem of kmemleak. But the
>> problem still existed when HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE is disabled, because in
>> this case, free_bootmem_page() will call free_reserved_page() directly.
> So I take it that with CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE=n, the issue
> described in dd0ff4d12dd2 still occurs?  That kmemleak reports an error
> and stops working?
Yes, you're right.
>
> So we want a cc:stable on this fix, yes?
Yes.
>
>> Fix the problem by adding kmemleak_free_part() in free_bootmem_page()
>> when HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE is disabled.
>>
>> Fixes: f41f2ed43ca5 ("mm: hugetlb: free the vmemmap pages associated with each HugeTLB page")
>> ...
> .
>