linux-kernel - Re: drm/drm_gem.c: Remove surplus else after return

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Jul 2023 02:14:10 +0800
From:   Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@...ngson.cn>
To:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: drm/drm_gem.c: Remove surplus else after return

Hi,  Thomas


On 2023/6/22 18:18, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> else is not generally useful after return
>
> Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@...ngson.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> index 1a5a2cd0d4ec..c18686f434d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> @@ -1150,8 +1150,8 @@ int drm_gem_pin(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
>   {
>   	if (obj->funcs->pin)
>   		return obj->funcs->pin(obj);
> -	else
> -		return 0;
> +
> +	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   void drm_gem_unpin(struct drm_gem_object *obj)


I have merge this patch with the dim tool, by using the following command,


  ./dim push-branch drm-misc-next


Is this looks fine?

I'm so worry about the dim tool now.

I want to make sure if I do the things correctly.