linux-kernel - [PATCH] perf/x86: Fix lockdep warning in for_each_sibling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230704181516.3293665-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue,  4 Jul 2023 11:15:15 -0700
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86: Fix lockdep warning in for_each_sibling_event() on SPR

On SPR, the load latency event needs an auxiliary event in the same
group to work properly.  There's a check in intel_pmu_hw_config()
for this to iterate sibling events and find a mem-loads-aux event.

The for_each_sibling_event() has a lockdep assert to make sure if it
disabled hardirq or hold leader->ctx->mutex.  This works well if the
given event has a separate leader event since perf_try_init_event()
grabs the leader->ctx->mutex to protect the sibling list.  But it can
cause a problem when the event itself is a leader since the event is
not initialized yet and there's no ctx for the event.

Actually I got a lockdep warning when I run the below command on SPR,
but I guess it could be a NULL pointer dereference.

  $ perf record -d -e cpu/mem-loads/uP true

The code path to the warning is:

  sys_perf_event_open()
    perf_event_alloc()
      perf_init_event()
        perf_try_init_event()
          x86_pmu_event_init()
            hsw_hw_config()
              intel_pmu_hw_config()
                for_each_sibling_event()
                  lockdep_assert_event_ctx()

We don't need for_each_sibling_event() when it's a standalone event.
Let's return the error code directly.

Fixes: f3c0eba28704 ("perf: Add a few assertions")
Reported-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 0d09245aa8df..933fe4894c32 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3983,6 +3983,14 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 		struct perf_event *leader = event->group_leader;
 		struct perf_event *sibling = NULL;
 
+		/*
+		 * The event is not fully initialized yet and no ctx is set
+		 * for the event.  Avoid for_each_sibling_event() since it
+		 * has a lockdep assert with leader->ctx->mutex.
+		 */
+		if (leader == event)
+			return -ENODATA;
+
 		if (!is_mem_loads_aux_event(leader)) {
 			for_each_sibling_event(sibling, leader) {
 				if (is_mem_loads_aux_event(sibling))
-- 
2.41.0.255.g8b1d071c50-goog