[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <857503f4-c828-3816-1bb0-5ee3567d63e0@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 13:39:42 -0700
From: Ryan McCann <quic_rmccann@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
CC: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/msm/dpu: Update dev core dump to dump
registers of sub-blocks
On 7/5/2023 1:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 05/07/2023 22:30, Ryan McCann wrote:
>> Currently, the device core dump mechanism does not dump registers of
>> sub-blocks within the DSPP, SSPP, DSC, and PINGPONG blocks. Edit
>> dpu_kms_mdp_snapshot function to account for sub-blocks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan McCann <quic_rmccann@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 106
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>> index aa8499de1b9f..c83f5d79e5c5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
>> @@ -890,62 +890,120 @@ static void dpu_kms_mdp_snapshot(struct
>> msm_disp_state *disp_state, struct msm_k
>> int i;
>> struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms;
>> const struct dpu_mdss_cfg *cat;
>> + void __iomem *mmio;
>> + u32 base;
>> dpu_kms = to_dpu_kms(kms);
>> cat = dpu_kms->catalog;
>> + mmio = dpu_kms->mmio;
>> pm_runtime_get_sync(&dpu_kms->pdev->dev);
>> /* dump CTL sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> for (i = 0; i < cat->ctl_count; i++)
>> - msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->ctl[i].len,
>> - dpu_kms->mmio + cat->ctl[i].base, "ctl_%d", i);
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->ctl[i].len, mmio
>> + cat->ctl[i].base,
>> + "%s", cat->ctl[i].name);
>
> This is not relevant to sub-blocks. If you wish to refactor the main
> block printing, please split it to a separate commit.
Ok. I will split this commit into changes pertaining to sub-blocks and
changes to how the name of main blocks are printed. I would like to
print main block names as they appear in the catalog.
>
> Also, please note that `msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(...., "%s",
> block->name)` is redundant. We do not expect formatting characters in
> block names. So, "%s" can be dropped.
Here, "%s" is used in order to print the the name of the main block from
the catalog. As mentioned above I can implement this in another commit.
>
>> /* dump DSPP sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> - for (i = 0; i < cat->dspp_count; i++)
>> - msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->dspp[i].len,
>> - dpu_kms->mmio + cat->dspp[i].base, "dspp_%d", i);
>> + for (i = 0; i < cat->dspp_count; i++) {
>> + base = cat->dspp[i].base;
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->dspp[i].len,
>> mmio + base, "%s",
>> + cat->dspp[i].name);
>> +
>> + if (cat->dspp[i].sblk && cat->dspp[i].sblk->pcc.len > 0)
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state,
>> cat->dspp[i].sblk->pcc.len,
>> + mmio + base + cat->dspp[i].sblk->pcc.base,
>> + "%s_%s", cat->dspp[i].name,
>> + cat->dspp[i].sblk->pcc.name);
>> + }
>> +
>> /* dump INTF sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> for (i = 0; i < cat->intf_count; i++)
>> - msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->intf[i].len,
>> - dpu_kms->mmio + cat->intf[i].base, "intf_%d", i);
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->intf[i].len,
>> mmio + cat->intf[i].base,
>> + "%s", cat->intf[i].name);
>> /* dump PP sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> - for (i = 0; i < cat->pingpong_count; i++)
>> - msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->pingpong[i].len,
>> - dpu_kms->mmio + cat->pingpong[i].base, "pingpong_%d",
>> i);
>> + for (i = 0; i < cat->pingpong_count; i++) {
>> + base = cat->pingpong[i].base;
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->pingpong[i].len,
>> mmio + base, "%s",
>> + cat->pingpong[i].name);
>> +
>> + /* TE2 block has length of 0, so will not print it */
>> +
>> + if (cat->pingpong[i].sblk &&
>> cat->pingpong[i].sblk->dither.len > 0)
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state,
>> cat->pingpong[i].sblk->dither.len,
>> + mmio + base +
>> cat->pingpong[i].sblk->dither.base,
>> + "%s_%s", cat->pingpong[i].name,
>> + cat->pingpong[i].sblk->dither.name);
>> + }
>> /* dump SSPP sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> - for (i = 0; i < cat->sspp_count; i++)
>> - msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->sspp[i].len,
>> - dpu_kms->mmio + cat->sspp[i].base, "sspp_%d", i);
>> + for (i = 0; i < cat->sspp_count; i++) {
>> + base = cat->sspp[i].base;
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->sspp[i].len,
>> mmio + cat->sspp[i].base,
>> + "%s", cat->sspp[i].name);
>> +
>> + if (cat->sspp[i].sblk && cat->sspp[i].sblk->scaler_blk.len > 0)
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state,
>> cat->sspp[i].sblk->scaler_blk.len,
>> + mmio + base +
>> cat->sspp[i].sblk->scaler_blk.base,
>> + "%s_%s", cat->sspp[i].name,
>> + cat->sspp[i].sblk->scaler_blk.name);
>> +
>> + if (cat->sspp[i].sblk && cat->sspp[i].sblk->csc_blk.len > 0)
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state,
>> cat->sspp[i].sblk->csc_blk.len,
>> + mmio + base +
>> cat->sspp[i].sblk->csc_blk.base,
>> + "%s_%s", cat->sspp[i].name,
>> + cat->sspp[i].sblk->csc_blk.name);
>> + }
>> /* dump LM sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> for (i = 0; i < cat->mixer_count; i++)
>> msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->mixer[i].len,
>> - dpu_kms->mmio + cat->mixer[i].base, "lm_%d", i);
>> + mmio + cat->mixer[i].base,
>> + "%s", cat->mixer[i].name);
>> /* dump WB sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> for (i = 0; i < cat->wb_count; i++)
>> - msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->wb[i].len,
>> - dpu_kms->mmio + cat->wb[i].base, "wb_%d", i);
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->wb[i].len, mmio
>> + cat->wb[i].base,
>> + "%s", cat->wb[i].name);
>> if (cat->mdp[0].features & BIT(DPU_MDP_PERIPH_0_REMOVED)) {
>> - msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, MDP_PERIPH_TOP0,
>> - dpu_kms->mmio + cat->mdp[0].base, "top");
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, MDP_PERIPH_TOP0, mmio
>> + cat->mdp[0].base,
>> + "top");
>> msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->mdp[0].len -
>> MDP_PERIPH_TOP0_END,
>> - dpu_kms->mmio + cat->mdp[0].base +
>> MDP_PERIPH_TOP0_END, "top_2");
>> + mmio + cat->mdp[0].base + MDP_PERIPH_TOP0_END,
>> + "top_2");
>> } else {
>> - msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->mdp[0].len,
>> - dpu_kms->mmio + cat->mdp[0].base, "top");
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->mdp[0].len, mmio
>> + cat->mdp[0].base,
>> + "top");
>> }
>> /* dump DSC sub-blocks HW regs info */
>> - for (i = 0; i < cat->dsc_count; i++)
>> - msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->dsc[i].len,
>> - dpu_kms->mmio + cat->dsc[i].base, "dsc_%d", i);
>> + for (i = 0; i < cat->dsc_count; i++) {
>> + base = cat->dsc[i].base;
>> +
>> + if (cat->dsc[i].features & BIT(DPU_DSC_HW_REV_1_2)) {
>> + struct dpu_dsc_blk enc = cat->dsc[i].sblk->enc;
>> + struct dpu_dsc_blk ctl = cat->dsc[i].sblk->ctl;
>> +
>> + /* For now, pass in a length of 0 because the DSC_BLK
>> register space
>> + * overlaps with the sblks' register space.
>> + *
>> + * TODO: Pass in a length of 0 t0 DSC_BLK_1_2 in the HW
>> catalog where
>> + * applicable.
>> + */
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, 0, mmio + base,
>> "%s", cat->dsc[i].name);
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, enc.len, mmio +
>> base + enc.base,
>> + "%s_%s", cat->dsc[i].name, enc.name);
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, ctl.len, mmio +
>> base + ctl.base,
>> + "%s_%s", cat->dsc[i].name, ctl.name);
>> + } else {
>> + msm_disp_snapshot_add_block(disp_state, cat->dsc[i].len,
>> mmio + base, "%s",
>> + cat->dsc[i].name);
>> + }
>> + }
>> pm_runtime_put_sync(&dpu_kms->pdev->dev);
>> }
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists