[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <278886bf-f469-a8cc-130a-f3e4614e7e1f@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 16:40:27 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 6 (arch/riscv/)
Hi Palmer,
On 7/6/23 14:46, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jul 2023 14:36:05 PDT (-0700), rdunlap@...radead.org wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/6/23 14:32, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>> On Thu, 06 Jul 2023 14:27:53 PDT (-0700), rdunlap@...radead.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/5/23 18:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please do *not* add any v6.6 related stuff to your linux-next included
>>>>> branches until after v6.5-rc1 has been released.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since 20230705:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> on riscv64:
>>>>
>>>> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: $xrv64i2p1_m2p0_a2p1_zicsr2p0_zifencei2p0_zihintpause2p0_zmmul1p0+0x14 (section: .text.unlikely.set_bit.constprop.0) -> numa_nodes_parsed (section: .init.data)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Full randconfig file is attached.
>>>
>>> Thanks, I'm giving it a look. Do you happen to also have your toolchain version easily availiable? The mapping symbols are new and we've seen some odd stuff happen, something is likely broken somewhere...
>>
>> I'm using gcc-13.1.0 from https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/
>
> Cool, those are pretty easy to run. I've yet to actually reproduce the
> failures, but I'd guess we just want to ignore the mapping symbols with
> something like
>
> diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> index b29b29707f10..2f801469301d 100644
> --- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> +++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> @@ -614,6 +614,18 @@ static int ignore_undef_symbol(struct elf_info *info, const char *symname)
> /* Expoline thunks are linked on all kernel modules during final link of .ko */
> if (strstarts(symname, "__s390_indirect_jump_r"))
> return 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * RISC-V defines various special symbols that start with "$". The
> + * mapping symbols, which exist to differentiate between incompatible
> + * instruction encodings when disassembling, show up all over the place
> + * and are generally not meant to be treated like other symbols. So
> + * just ignore any of the special symbols.
> + */
> + if (info->hdr->e_machine == EM_RISCV)
> + if (symname[0] == '$')
> + return 1;
> +
> /* Do not ignore this symbol */
> return 0;
> }
>
> I haven't even built that, though...
That builds without any errors or warnings, but it doesn't fix the section mismatch
warning.
> These also trip up backtraces, so we probably need something over there as
> well.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists