[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cab1b506-1f77-0532-f606-4fd4165d307c@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 15:20:48 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: jirislaby@...nel.org, jacobly.alt@...il.com,
holger@...lied-asynchrony.com, hdegoede@...hat.com,
michel@...pinasse.org, jglisse@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, hannes@...xchg.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
dave@...olabs.net, willy@...radead.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com,
peterz@...radead.org, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com, paulmck@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, luto@...nel.org,
songliubraving@...com, peterx@...hat.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
hughd@...gle.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev,
punit.agrawal@...edance.com, lstoakes@...il.com,
peterjung1337@...il.com, rientjes@...gle.com, chriscli@...gle.com,
axelrasmussen@...gle.com, joelaf@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com,
rppt@...nel.org, jannh@...gle.com, shakeelb@...gle.com,
tatashin@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com, gthelen@...gle.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] fork: lock VMAs of the parent process when forking
On 06.07.23 03:13, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> When forking a child process, parent write-protects an anonymous page
> and COW-shares it with the child being forked using copy_present_pte().
> Parent's TLB is flushed right before we drop the parent's mmap_lock in
> dup_mmap(). If we get a write-fault before that TLB flush in the parent,
> and we end up replacing that anonymous page in the parent process in
> do_wp_page() (because, COW-shared with the child), this might lead to
> some stale writable TLB entries targeting the wrong (old) page.
> Similar issue happened in the past with userfaultfd (see flush_tlb_page()
> call inside do_wp_page()).
> Lock VMAs of the parent process when forking a child, which prevents
> concurrent page faults during fork operation and avoids this issue.
> This fix can potentially regress some fork-heavy workloads. Kernel build
> time did not show noticeable regression on a 56-core machine while a
> stress test mapping 10000 VMAs and forking 5000 times in a tight loop
> shows ~7% regression. If such fork time regression is unacceptable,
> disabling CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK should restore its performance. Further
> optimizations are possible if this regression proves to be problematic.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Reported-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/dbdef34c-3a07-5951-e1ae-e9c6e3cdf51b@kernel.org/
> Reported-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@...lied-asynchrony.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/b198d649-f4bf-b971-31d0-e8433ec2a34c@applied-asynchrony.com/
> Reported-by: Jacob Young <jacobly.alt@...il.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217624
> Fixes: 0bff0aaea03e ("x86/mm: try VMA lock-based page fault handling first")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Feel free to keep my ACK on minor changes.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists