linux-kernel - Re: 回复: [PATCH] block: mq-deadline: rename sort_list to sort

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Jul 2023 08:05:07 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     李培锋(wink) <lipeifeng@...o.com>
Cc:     "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        张诗明(Simon Zhang) 
        <zhangshiming@...o.com>, 郭健 <guojian@...o.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Subject: Re: 回复: [PATCH] block: mq-deadline: rename sort_list to sort_rb

On 7/6/23 3:27?AM, ???(wink) wrote:
>>>> Mq-deadline would store request in list:fifo_list and 
>>>> rb_tree:sort_list, and sort_list should be renamed to sort_rb which 
>>>> is beneficial for understanding.
> 
>>> Huh? I think this patch makes the code less readable instead of more readable ...
> 
>> Huh? Maybe we had different opinions about it, I thinks the essence of this word is 'sort'
>> So that reader can get the meaning of it easily. And in my mind, *_rb is more reasonable for rb_root ratherthan *_list for reader.
> 
> Hi Sir?
> Should it be merged for the above reason? Hope for your reply, thanks.

No, the patch makes no sense. I agree with Bart that it doesn't make it
any more readable, in fact it's worse. We have a sort and fifo list, the
backing data structure isn't that exciting by itself.

-- 
Jens Axboe