[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <87wmz7q1fr.fsf@bloch.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 16:35:36 +0200
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: d3adme4t@...il.com, macromorgan@...mail.com, jbx6244@...il.com,
f.kardame@...jaro.org, amadeus@....edu.cn, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux.amoon@...il.com, aurelien@...el32.net, anarsoul@...il.com,
wiagn233@...look.com, frattaroli.nicolas@...il.com,
strit@...jaro.org, luiz.von.dentz@...el.com, zonyitoo@...il.com,
wens@...e.org, jensenhuang@...endlyarm.com, lasstp5011@...il.com,
frank-w@...lic-files.de, pgwipeout@...il.com, conor+dt@...nel.org,
leo@...am.net, andyshrk@....com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
michael.riesch@...fvision.net, jonas@...boo.se, festevam@...x.de,
tobetter@...il.com, jagan@...rulasolutions.com, cnsztl@...il.com,
cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com, heiko@...ech.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Drop invalid regulator-init-microvolt property
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 16:16:16 +0200
>
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 19:22:17 +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > The 'regulator-init-microvolt' property is not currently supported by
> > any driver, it was simply carried on from downstream kernels.
> >
> > The problem is also indicated by the following dtbs_check warning:
> >
> > rk3588-rock-5b.dtb: pmic@0: regulators:dcdc-reg4: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('regulator-init-microvolt' was unexpected)
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
> [1/1] arm64: dts: rockchip: Drop invalid regulator-init-microvolt property
> commit: 4d08b19629495b29601991d09d07865694c25199
This property *is used* by the drivers in U-Boot. Dropping this from
the Linux DTBs will likely result in broken boards the next time the
U-Boot DTBs are synched again from Linux. At least that is what
happened before...
I think the right solution is to add this property to the DT binding
instead.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists