[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQK5RLqVhc9AxaCSuQxFRDAb8wohmUDNrYEViXLf5mEMNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 16:45:30 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Yizhou Tang <tangyeechou@...il.com>, kernel-patches-bot@...com,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Introduce bpf user log
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 9:08 PM Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@...il.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 34fa334938ba5..8a458cfcd91bd 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1549,7 +1549,6 @@ union bpf_attr {
> };
> __u32 attach_type; /* attach type */
> __u32 flags; /* extra flags */
> - struct bpf_generic_user_log log; /* user log */
> union {
> __u32 target_btf_id; /* btf_id of target to attach to */
> struct {
> @@ -1585,6 +1584,9 @@ union bpf_attr {
> __s32 priority;
> __u32 flags;
> } netfilter;
> + struct {
> + struct bpf_generic_user_log ulog; /* user log */
> + } xdp;
1.
You cannot break api in patch 1 and fix it in patch 2.
2.
libbpf side is missing.
3.
selftest is missing.
4.
bpf_vlog_finalize() should be used and error propagated back through
link_create.
Same api must be used: log_level, log_size, log_buf, log_true_size.
But considering all that I agree with Daniel Xu that
tracepoint would be better here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists