[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <115c6eac-ab28-7220-e1e4-5747bf641bbe@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 10:55:38 +0800
From: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@...il.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Yizhou Tang <tangyeechou@...il.com>, kernel-patches-bot@...com,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Introduce bpf user log
On 11/7/23 07:45, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 9:08 PM Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@...il.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> index 34fa334938ba5..8a458cfcd91bd 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -1549,7 +1549,6 @@ union bpf_attr {
>> };
>> __u32 attach_type; /* attach type */
>> __u32 flags; /* extra flags */
>> - struct bpf_generic_user_log log; /* user log */
>> union {
>> __u32 target_btf_id; /* btf_id of target to attach to */
>> struct {
>> @@ -1585,6 +1584,9 @@ union bpf_attr {
>> __s32 priority;
>> __u32 flags;
>> } netfilter;
>> + struct {
>> + struct bpf_generic_user_log ulog; /* user log */
>> + } xdp;
>
> 1.
> You cannot break api in patch 1 and fix it in patch 2.
>
> 2.
> libbpf side is missing.
>
> 3.
> selftest is missing.
>
> 4.
> bpf_vlog_finalize() should be used and error propagated back through
> link_create.
> Same api must be used: log_level, log_size, log_buf, log_true_size.
>
> But considering all that I agree with Daniel Xu that
> tracepoint would be better here.
Sorry for missing 2&3.
Tracepoint is considered. I'll change it from user log to a tracepoint.
I'll submit tracepoint patch with libbpf&selftest patches later.
Thanks,
Leon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists