linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos/i9100: Fix LCD screen's physical size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:35:54 +0200
From:   Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos/i9100: Fix LCD screen's
 physical size

Hi Krzysztof,

Le lundi 10 juillet 2023 à 08:59 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
> On 08/07/2023 10:40, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> > The previous values were completely bogus, and resulted in the
> > computed
> > DPI ratio being much lower than reality, causing applications and
> > UIs to
> > misbehave.
> > 
> > The new values were measured by myself with a ruler.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> > Fixes: 8620cc2f99b7 ("ARM: dts: exynos: Add devicetree file for the
> > Galaxy S2")
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v5.8+
> > ---
> 
> This does not apply. You rebased your work on some older
> version/tree,
> without new layout. Please work on linux-next.

This patchset was based on drm-misc-next, because that's where I was
planning to apply it; and it was extremely unlikely (but not
impossible, apparently) that the i9100.dts would be modified in the
meantime.

I can rebase on linux-next, the problem then is that I then don't know
how/where to apply the patchset.

Cheers,
-Paul