linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos/i9100: Fix LCD screen's physical size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:45:01 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos/i9100: Fix LCD screen's physical
 size

On 10/07/2023 09:35, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Le lundi 10 juillet 2023 à 08:59 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
>> On 08/07/2023 10:40, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>>> The previous values were completely bogus, and resulted in the
>>> computed
>>> DPI ratio being much lower than reality, causing applications and
>>> UIs to
>>> misbehave.
>>>
>>> The new values were measured by myself with a ruler.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
>>> Fixes: 8620cc2f99b7 ("ARM: dts: exynos: Add devicetree file for the
>>> Galaxy S2")
>>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v5.8+
>>> ---
>>
>> This does not apply. You rebased your work on some older
>> version/tree,
>> without new layout. Please work on linux-next.
> 
> This patchset was based on drm-misc-next, because that's where I was
> planning to apply it; and it was extremely unlikely (but not
> impossible, apparently) that the i9100.dts would be modified in the
> meantime.
> 
> I can rebase on linux-next, the problem then is that I then don't know
> how/where to apply the patchset.

DTS cannot go via drm-misc-next, so if that's your intention please
always split the patchset into separate ones. *Always*.

Best regards,
Krzysztof