[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bz2s6nyjwl6l7yfrd4wtjdtousv23ypcdleckibps5lyjpwi4x@wqq6qqesevpk>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 10:27:17 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
To: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro@...tmail.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
James Smart <jsmart2021@...il.com>,
Martin Belanger <Martin.Belanger@...l.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v1 2/3] nvme/rc: Avoid triggering host nvme-cli
autoconnect
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 07:11:58PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>
>
> On 20/06/2023 16:27, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > When the host has enabled the udev/systemd autoconnect services for the
> > fc transport it interacts with blktests and make tests break.
> >
> > nvme-cli learned to ignore connects attemps when using the
> > --context command line option paired with a volatile configuration. Thus
> > we can mark all the resources created by blktests and avoid any
> > interaction with the systemd autoconnect scripts.
>
> why would we like to ignore connect attempts during blktests ?
The problem I observed is that there were two connect attempts (one triggered
via udev and one via the test itself) which disturbed the test. The interference
resulted into a complete hang of the test case:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/6g53yj5afhhonwf2psf7ft2gkakkwewy7klkix3y3u6uclpa5w@tt2yfzigyxgg/
> We define unique nqn/ids/etc. So we never should disturb other running
> services, unless it uses the same parameters, which shouldn't happen.
Yes, that should do the decoupling between udev and blktests.
> Agree on setting the hard coded values for hostnqn and hostid instead of
> reading the /etc/nvme/* files. This should do the work IMO, isn't it ?
Do you mean that nvme-cli will ignore the udev trigger when a different hostnqn
is invovled? At least for the well-known discover controller the hostqnq
doesn't work. Though not sure if I understood you correctly here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists