[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d752e5e0-3c34-02ad-6768-42eb2c66e582@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:37:47 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: quic_srichara@...cinc.com, quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com,
quic_anusha@...cinc.com, quic_saahtoma@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: drop the IPQ5019 SoC ID
On 10/07/2023 12:54, Kathiravan T wrote:
> IPQ5019 SoC is not available in production. Lets drop it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
> ---
> include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
> index bcbe9ee2cdaf..179dd56b2d95 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
> @@ -250,7 +250,6 @@
> #define QCOM_ID_QRU1000 539
> #define QCOM_ID_QDU1000 545
> #define QCOM_ID_QDU1010 587
> -#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5019 569
What about users of this binding? What's the impact on them? When did
the SoC become obsolete and unsupported by Qualcomm? Remember that
ceasing a production does not mean that magically all users of a product
disappear...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists