lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d752e5e0-3c34-02ad-6768-42eb2c66e582@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:37:47 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     quic_srichara@...cinc.com, quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com,
        quic_anusha@...cinc.com, quic_saahtoma@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom,ids: drop the IPQ5019 SoC ID

On 10/07/2023 12:54, Kathiravan T wrote:
> IPQ5019 SoC is not available in production. Lets drop it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
> index bcbe9ee2cdaf..179dd56b2d95 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h
> @@ -250,7 +250,6 @@
>  #define QCOM_ID_QRU1000			539
>  #define QCOM_ID_QDU1000			545
>  #define QCOM_ID_QDU1010			587
> -#define QCOM_ID_IPQ5019			569

What about users of this binding? What's the impact on them? When did
the SoC become obsolete and unsupported by Qualcomm? Remember that
ceasing a production does not mean that magically all users of a product
disappear...


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ