linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: qcom: socinfo: drop the IPQ5019 SoC ID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b293432d-fc1f-2d2e-1289-548f44ec8c02@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:38:54 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     quic_srichara@...cinc.com, quic_sjaganat@...cinc.com,
        quic_anusha@...cinc.com, quic_saahtoma@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: qcom: socinfo: drop the IPQ5019 SoC ID

On 10/07/2023 12:54, Kathiravan T wrote:
> IPQ5019 SoC is not available in production. Lets drop it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c
> index 4d49945b3a35..78293ab13c87 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c
> @@ -406,7 +406,6 @@ static const struct soc_id soc_id[] = {
>  	{ qcom_board_id(QRU1000) },
>  	{ qcom_board_id(QDU1000) },
>  	{ qcom_board_id(QDU1010) },
> -	{ qcom_board_id(IPQ5019) },

Similar concerns as for patch #1, although a bit smaller because this is
not an ABI. Anyway, commit msg said only that it is not available
anymore, but does not explain anything about existing users...

Best regards,
Krzysztof