lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <972a06e0-6841-043e-fc00-db7596f664c4@nvidia.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:31:23 +0300
From:   Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>
To:     Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>
Cc:     linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
        Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro@...tmail.com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        James Smart <jsmart2021@...il.com>,
        Martin Belanger <Martin.Belanger@...l.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v1 2/3] nvme/rc: Avoid triggering host nvme-cli
 autoconnect



On 10/07/2023 13:19, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:53:17PM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>   > > Agree on setting the hard coded values for hostnqn and hostid instead of
>>>> reading the /etc/nvme/* files. This should do the work IMO, isn't it ?
>>>
>>> Do you mean that nvme-cli will ignore the udev trigger when a different hostnqn
>>> is invovled? At least for the well-known discover controller the hostqnq
>>> doesn't work. Though not sure if I understood you correctly here.
>>
>> All I was saying is that your issue would have been fixed easily by 2-3 LOC
>> by removing the usage of /etc/nvme/* files that are usually configured by
>> system administrator and use a default values for blktests hostnqn and
>> hostid.
> 
> Okay.
> 
>> The usage of --context in blktests is redundant IMO.
> 
> Right, I made a bit of a mess with the commit message. Sorry about that.

I think it is more than just commit message.
A lot of code that we can avoid was added regarding the --context 
cmdline argument.
Maybe it's worth cleaning it..

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ