linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf probe: fix regression introduced by switch to die_get_decl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1c85c4d6-7097-bc0a-d0ca-ebe234d63ece@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2023 14:32:28 +0200
From:   "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" 
        <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To:     Georg Müller <georgmueller@....net>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] perf probe: fix regression introduced by switch to
 die_get_decl_file

Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting
for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.

Masami, Arnaldo, what's up here? Georg (who is not a regular
contributor) afaics found a regression in a commit you
authored/committed and even provided a patch-set to fix it (the first
one nearly four weeks ago, e.g. before the merge window started), but
hasn't received much support from your side to get this in. Could you
please look into this to get this cleared up? Or am I missing something
and progress to fix this has been made?

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.


On 28.06.23 10:45, Georg Müller wrote:
> When switching from dwarf_decl_file() to die_get_decl_file(), a regression
> was introduced when having a binary where the DWARF info is split to
> multiple CUs. It is not possible to add probes to certain functions.
> 
> These patches introduce a testcase which shows the current regression
> and a fix for the issue
> 
> Signed-off-by: Georg Müller <georgmueller@....net>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5a00d5a5-7be7-ef8a-4044-9a16249fff25@gmx.net/
> 
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>  - Add testcase
> 
> Changes in v3:
>  - start new thread
>  - add stable to cc
> 
> Georg Müller (2):
>   perf probe: add test for regression introduced by switch to
>     die_get_decl_file
>   perf probe: read DWARF files from the correct CU
> 
>  .../shell/test_uprobe_from_different_cu.sh    | 77 +++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/dwarf-aux.c                   |  4 +-
>  2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/test_uprobe_from_different_cu.sh
> 
> --
> 2.41.0
> 
> 
>