lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230711161930.GA250687@bhelgaas>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:19:30 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Amadeusz Sławiński 
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] PCI: Define Intel PCI IDs and use them in drivers

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 05:42:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 17:36:20 +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 05:24:07PM +0200, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > On 7/11/23 14:57, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
> > 
> > > > Simplify things, by adding PCI IDs to global header and make use of them
> > > > in drivers. This allows for removal of comments by having IDs themselves
> > > > being self explanatory. Additionally it allows for removal of existing
> > > > inconsistencies by having one source of truth.
> > 
> > > I'd like to hear from Takashi and Mark on how this would work, we have
> > > to provide new PCI IDs for both trees using a common 'pci_ids.h' file.
> > 
> > We can probably just agree on a tree to apply things and work from
> > there.
> 
> Yes, simply apply on top of 6.5-rc1 or such a stable point and tag it.
> Then other trees can merging it.
> 
> I can do it if both Bjorn and Mark agree (after all patches get
> reviewed and no objection comes up).

Sure.  I acked the PCI ones, so you can merge these via whatever tree
makes the most sense.  We might have minor conflicts during the merge
window, but they should be easy to fix.

Bjorn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ