linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cgroup: remove unneeded return value of cgroup_rm_cftypes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZK3MR5liSMSrlKVm@slm.duckdns.org>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:40:23 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc:     hannes@...xchg.org, lizefan.x@...edance.com,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: remove unneeded return value of
 cgroup_rm_cftypes_locked()

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:00:58AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2023/7/11 3:40, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 03:38:56PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> >> The return value of cgroup_rm_cftypes_locked() is always 0. So remove
> >> it to simplify the code. No functional change intended.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> > 
> > Applied to cgroup/for-6.6. Please feel free to follow up with the comment
> > addition Michal suggested.
> 
> Should I send a v2 patch or a separate patch? Both is fine to me.

Please send a separate patch.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun