[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK9=C2XG9fsvUxnL98gKstxdpdOOAV3UZ3DAV66=S4DJcutzKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 17:07:11 +0530
From: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Misc RISC-V timer driver improvements
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 4:51 PM Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 06:49:00PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > This series does two improvements to the RISC-V timer driver:
> > 1) Keep timer interrupt enable state in-sync with interrupt subsystem
> > 2) Increase rating of clock event device when Sstc is available
> >
> > These patches can also be found in the riscv_timer_imp_v1 branch at:
> > https://github.com/avpatel/linux.git
>
> Other than wondering why you opted for 450 (curiosity really), this
> stuff looks fine to me.
It is the same as the rating for clock_event_device used by ARM arch timer.
(Refer, __arch_timer_setup() in drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c)
>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> Cheers,
> Conor.
Regards,
Anup
Powered by blists - more mailing lists