[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dba58cf1-59ed-f1f3-fdbe-59d213f0a7b5@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 16:12:54 +0200
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, mhartmay@...ux.ibm.com, nsg@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ibm.com, nrb@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: pv: fix index value of replaced ASCE
On 5/7/23 13:19, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> The index field of the struct page corresponding to a guest ASCE should
> be 0. When replacing the ASCE in s390_replace_asce(), the index of the
> new ASCE should also be set to 0.
>
> Having the wrong index might lead to the wrong addresses being passed
> around when notifying pte invalidations, and eventually to validity
> intercepts (VM crash) if the prefix gets unmapped and the notifier gets
> called with the wrong address.
Can that also happen in crst_table_alloc()?
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/mm/gmap.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists