[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230712-bulldozer-affected-199042dc3afd@wendy>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 11:39:16 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...osinc.com>
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng" <i@...ithal.me>, <linux@...osinc.com>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...ll.eu>,
Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>,
Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<sorear@...tmail.com>, Jiatai He <jiatai2021@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] RISC-V: Add Bitmanip/Scalar Crypto parsing from DT
Hey Samuel, Evan,
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:41:17AM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> From: "Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng" <i@...ithal.me>
>
> Parse Zb/Zk related string from DT and output them to cpuinfo.
One thing that has sprung to mind is that this is not limited to DT
anymore, since the information could in theory come from ACPI too.
Ditto the title I guess.
> It is worth noting that the Scalar Crypto extension defines "zk" as a
> shorthand for the Zkn, Zkr and Zkt extensions. Since the Zkn one also
> implies the Zbkb, Zbkc and Zbkx extensions, simply passing the valid
> "zk" extension name through a DT will enable all of the Zbkb, Zbkc,
> Zbkx, Zkn, Zkr and Zkt extensions.
>
> Also, since there currently is no mechanism to merge all enabled
> extensions, the generated cpuinfo output could be relatively large.
> For example, setting the "riscv,isa" DT property to "rv64imafdc_zk_zks"
> will generate the following cpuinfo output:
> "rv64imafdc_zbkb_zbkc_zbkx_zknd_zkne_zknh_zkr_zksed_zksh_zkt".
On that note, I've created another version of what checking for
supersets could look like, since it'll be needed either by my series or
this one, depending on what gets merged first. I've yet to test the
dedicated extensions part of it, but I wanted to get this out before I
went looking at other fixes in the area.
Evan, since it was you that commented on this stuff last time around,
could you take another look? I'm still not keen on the "subset_of"
arrays, but they're an improvement on what I had last time around for
sure.
(I took authorship since only the #defines & part of the commit
message came from the original commit)
-- >8 --
From 2351c46fd1c9f6de312463875a4887f03d365b76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 11:25:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: add detection of scalar crypto extensions
It is worth noting that the Scalar Crypto extension defines "zk" as a
shorthand for the Zkn, Zkr and Zkt extensions. Since the Zkn one also
implies the Zbkb, Zbkc and Zbkx extensions, simply passing the valid
"zk" extension name through a DT shold enable all of the Zbkb, Zbkc,
Zbkx, Zkn, Zkr and Zkt extensions.
For example, setting the "riscv,isa" DT property to "rv64imafdc_zk"
should generate the following cpuinfo output:
"rv64imafdc_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm_zbkb_zbkc_zbkx_zknd_zkne_zknh_zkr_zkt"
riscv_isa_ext_data grows a pair of new members, to permit searching for
supersets of the extension in question, both while parsing the ISA
string and the new dedicated extension properties.
Co-developed-by: Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng <i@...ithal.me>
Signed-off-by: Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng <i@...ithal.me>
Co-developed-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...osinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...osinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 13 +++++
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
index b7b58258f6c7..46d54f31e162 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
@@ -58,6 +58,17 @@
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICSR 40
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIFENCEI 41
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM 42
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBC 43
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKB 44
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKC 45
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKX 46
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKND 47
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNE 48
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNH 49
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKR 50
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSED 51
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSH 52
+#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKT 53
#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX 64
@@ -77,6 +88,8 @@ struct riscv_isa_ext_data {
const unsigned int id;
const char *name;
const char *property;
+ const unsigned int superset_count;
+ const char **subset_of;
};
extern const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[];
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 5945dfc5f806..e862958d5495 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -103,8 +103,22 @@ static bool riscv_isa_extension_check(int id)
.name = #_name, \
.property = #_name, \
.id = _id, \
+ .superset_count = 0, \
+ .subset_of = NULL, \
}
+#define __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_SUBSET(_name, _id, _subset_of) { \
+ .name = #_name, \
+ .property = #_name, \
+ .id = _id, \
+ .superset_count = ARRAY_SIZE(_subset_of), \
+ .subset_of = _subset_of, \
+}
+
+static const char * const riscv_subset_of_zbk[] = { "zk", "zkn", "zks" };
+static const char * const riscv_subset_of_zkn[] = { "zk", "zkn" };
+static const char * const riscv_subset_of_zk[] = { "zk" };
+static const char * const riscv_subset_of_zks[] = { "zks" };
/*
* The canonical order of ISA extension names in the ISA string is defined in
* chapter 27 of the unprivileged specification.
@@ -167,7 +181,18 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zihpm, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZIHPM),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zba, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBA),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBC),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_SUBSET(zbkb, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKB, riscv_subset_of_zbk),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_SUBSET(zbkc, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKC, riscv_subset_of_zbk),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_SUBSET(zbkx, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBKX, riscv_subset_of_zbk),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zbs, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBS),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_SUBSET(zknd, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKND, riscv_subset_of_zkn),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_SUBSET(zkne, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNE, riscv_subset_of_zkn),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_SUBSET(zknh, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKNH, riscv_subset_of_zkn),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_SUBSET(zkr, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKR, riscv_subset_of_zk),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_SUBSET(zksed, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSED, riscv_subset_of_zks),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_SUBSET(zksh, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKSH, riscv_subset_of_zks),
+ __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_SUBSET(zkt, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZKT, riscv_subset_of_zk),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(smaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SMAIA),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(ssaia, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSAIA),
__RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(sscofpmf, RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSCOFPMF),
@@ -179,6 +204,31 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = {
const size_t riscv_isa_ext_count = ARRAY_SIZE(riscv_isa_ext);
+static inline int __init riscv_try_match_extension(const char *name, const unsigned int bit,
+ const char *ext, const char *ext_end,
+ struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo)
+{
+ if ((ext_end - ext == strlen(name)) && !strncasecmp(ext, name, strlen(name)) &&
+ riscv_isa_extension_check(bit)) {
+ set_bit(bit, isainfo->isa);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return -ENOENT;
+}
+
+static inline void __init riscv_try_match_supersets(struct riscv_isa_ext_data ext_data,
+ const char *ext, const char *ext_end,
+ struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo)
+{
+ for (int i = 0; i < ext_data.superset_count; i++) {
+ const char *superset = ext_data.subset_of[i];
+ const int bit = ext_data.id;
+
+ riscv_try_match_extension(superset, bit, ext, ext_end, isainfo);
+ }
+}
+
static void __init riscv_parse_isa_string(unsigned long *this_hwcap, struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo,
unsigned long *isa2hwcap, const char *isa)
{
@@ -310,16 +360,9 @@ static void __init riscv_parse_isa_string(unsigned long *this_hwcap, struct risc
if (*isa == '_')
++isa;
-#define SET_ISA_EXT_MAP(name, bit) \
- do { \
- if ((ext_end - ext == sizeof(name) - 1) && \
- !strncasecmp(ext, name, sizeof(name) - 1) && \
- riscv_isa_extension_check(bit)) \
- set_bit(bit, isainfo->isa); \
- } while (false) \
-
if (unlikely(ext_err))
continue;
+
if (!ext_long) {
int nr = tolower(*ext) - 'a';
@@ -327,12 +370,21 @@ static void __init riscv_parse_isa_string(unsigned long *this_hwcap, struct risc
*this_hwcap |= isa2hwcap[nr];
set_bit(nr, isainfo->isa);
}
- } else {
+
for (int i = 0; i < riscv_isa_ext_count; i++)
- SET_ISA_EXT_MAP(riscv_isa_ext[i].name,
- riscv_isa_ext[i].id);
+ riscv_try_match_supersets(riscv_isa_ext[i], ext, ext_end, isainfo);
+ } else {
+ for (int i = 0; i < riscv_isa_ext_count; i++) {
+ const char *name = riscv_isa_ext[i].name;
+ const int bit = riscv_isa_ext[i].id;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = riscv_try_match_extension(name, bit, ext, ext_end, isainfo);
+ if (ret && riscv_isa_ext[i].superset_count)
+ riscv_try_match_supersets(riscv_isa_ext[i], ext,
+ ext_end, isainfo);
+ }
}
-#undef SET_ISA_EXT_MAP
}
}
@@ -434,8 +486,23 @@ static int __init riscv_fill_hwcap_from_ext_list(unsigned long *isa2hwcap)
continue;
for (int i = 0; i < riscv_isa_ext_count; i++) {
- if (of_property_match_string(cpu_node, "riscv,isa-extensions",
- riscv_isa_ext[i].property) < 0)
+ struct riscv_isa_ext_data ext = riscv_isa_ext[i];
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = of_property_match_string(cpu_node, "riscv,isa-extensions",
+ ext.property);
+
+ if (ret < 0 && ext.superset_count) {
+ for (int j = 0; j < ext.superset_count; j++) {
+ ret = of_property_match_string(cpu_node,
+ "riscv,isa-extensions",
+ ext.subset_of[j]);
+ if (ret >= 0)
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (ret < 0)
continue;
if (!riscv_isa_extension_check(riscv_isa_ext[i].id))
--
2.40.1
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists