[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cd0fb281-b621-4d6b-be94-be6095e35328@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 21:30:04 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Pranavi Somisetty <pranavi.somisetty@....com>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, michal.simek@....com, harini.katakam@....com,
git@....com, radhey.shyam.pandey@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: xilinx_gmii2rgmii: Convert to json
schema
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 08:53:34PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/07/2023 17:59, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>> +examples:
> >>> + - |
> >>> + mdio {
> >>> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >>> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >>> + phy: ethernet-phy@0 {
> >>> + reg = <0>;
> >>> + };
> >>
> >> Drop this node, quite obvious.
> >
> > Dumb question. Isn't it needed since it is referenced by phy-handle =
> > <&phy> below. Without it, the fragment is not valid DT and so the
> > checking tools will fail?
>
> No, because the example is compiled with silencing missing phandles.
Ah, thanks.
This is a rather odd device, there is no other like it in mainline, so
i think having that PHY is useful, even if you think it is obvious
what is going on here.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists