[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ebd30cd0-5081-f05d-28f7-5d5b637041e4@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 20:53:34 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Pranavi Somisetty <pranavi.somisetty@....com>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, michal.simek@....com, harini.katakam@....com,
git@....com, radhey.shyam.pandey@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: xilinx_gmii2rgmii: Convert to json
schema
On 13/07/2023 17:59, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> +examples:
>>> + - |
>>> + mdio {
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> + phy: ethernet-phy@0 {
>>> + reg = <0>;
>>> + };
>>
>> Drop this node, quite obvious.
>
> Dumb question. Isn't it needed since it is referenced by phy-handle =
> <&phy> below. Without it, the fragment is not valid DT and so the
> checking tools will fail?
No, because the example is compiled with silencing missing phandles.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists