[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a17b0a4f-619d-47dd-b0ad-d5f3c1a558fc@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:59:15 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Pranavi Somisetty <pranavi.somisetty@....com>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, michal.simek@....com, harini.katakam@....com,
git@....com, radhey.shyam.pandey@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: xilinx_gmii2rgmii: Convert to json
schema
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + mdio {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + phy: ethernet-phy@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + };
>
> Drop this node, quite obvious.
Dumb question. Isn't it needed since it is referenced by phy-handle =
<&phy> below. Without it, the fragment is not valid DT and so the
checking tools will fail?
> > + gmiitorgmii@8 {
> > + compatible = "xlnx,gmii-to-rgmii-1.0";
> > + reg = <8>;
> > + phy-handle = <&phy>;
> > + };
> > + };
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists