linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <168927786232.267267.7055463236282761197.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2023 20:51:02 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>
Cc:     Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
        Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, kernel@...electronics.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional

On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 11:03:28 +0200, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:
> This patch makes the use of IRQ optional to make the DA9061/62 usable
> for designs that don't have the IRQ pin connected, because the regulator
> is usable without IRQ.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional
      commit: 497897cb200d03b89524e6b4dfb71c77af324766

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark