linux-kernel - [PATCH v1] mm/hwpoison: rename hwp_walk* to hwpoison

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230713235553.4121855-1-jiaqiyan@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2023 23:55:53 +0000
From:   Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@...gle.com>
To:     naoya.horiguchi@....com
Cc:     linmiaohe@...wei.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        willy@...radead.org, Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] mm/hwpoison: rename hwp_walk* to hwpoison_walk*

In the discussion of "Improve hugetlbfs read on HWPOISON hugepages",
Matthew Wilcox suggests hwp is a bad abbreviation of hwpoison, as hwp
is already used as "an acronym by acpi, intel_pstate, some clock
drivers, an ethernet driver, and a scsi driver"[1].

So rename hwp_walk and hwp_walk_ops to hwpoison_walk and
hwpoison_walk_ops respectively.

raw_hwp_(page|list), *_raw_hwp, and raw_hwp_unreliable flag are other
major appearances of "hwp". However, given the "raw" hint in the name,
it is easy to differentiate them from other "hwp" acronyms. Since
renaming them is not as straightforward as renaming hwp_walk*, they
are not covered by this commit.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230707201904.953262-5-jiaqiyan@google.com/T/#me6fecb8ce1ad4d5769199c9e162a44bc88f7bdec

Signed-off-by: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@...gle.com>
---
 mm/memory-failure.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index e245191e6b04..cb232e41f6c0 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ static void collect_procs(struct page *page, struct list_head *tokill,
 		collect_procs_file(page, tokill, force_early);
 }
 
-struct hwp_walk {
+struct hwpoison_walk {
 	struct to_kill tk;
 	unsigned long pfn;
 	int flags;
@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ static int check_hwpoisoned_entry(pte_t pte, unsigned long addr, short shift,
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
 static int check_hwpoisoned_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
-				      struct hwp_walk *hwp)
+				      struct hwpoison_walk *hwp)
 {
 	pmd_t pmd = *pmdp;
 	unsigned long pfn;
@@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ static int check_hwpoisoned_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
 }
 #else
 static int check_hwpoisoned_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
-				      struct hwp_walk *hwp)
+				      struct hwpoison_walk *hwp)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ static int check_hwpoisoned_pmd_entry(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
 static int hwpoison_pte_range(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long addr,
 			      unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk)
 {
-	struct hwp_walk *hwp = walk->private;
+	struct hwpoison_walk *hwp = walk->private;
 	int ret = 0;
 	pte_t *ptep, *mapped_pte;
 	spinlock_t *ptl;
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ static int hwpoison_hugetlb_range(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long hmask,
 			    unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 			    struct mm_walk *walk)
 {
-	struct hwp_walk *hwp = walk->private;
+	struct hwpoison_walk *hwp = walk->private;
 	pte_t pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
 	struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(walk->vma);
 
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ static int hwpoison_hugetlb_range(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long hmask,
 #define hwpoison_hugetlb_range	NULL
 #endif
 
-static const struct mm_walk_ops hwp_walk_ops = {
+static const struct mm_walk_ops hwpoison_walk_ops = {
 	.pmd_entry = hwpoison_pte_range,
 	.hugetlb_entry = hwpoison_hugetlb_range,
 };
@@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ static int kill_accessing_process(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long pfn,
 				  int flags)
 {
 	int ret;
-	struct hwp_walk priv = {
+	struct hwpoison_walk priv = {
 		.pfn = pfn,
 	};
 	priv.tk.tsk = p;
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ static int kill_accessing_process(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long pfn,
 		return -EFAULT;
 
 	mmap_read_lock(p->mm);
-	ret = walk_page_range(p->mm, 0, TASK_SIZE, &hwp_walk_ops,
+	ret = walk_page_range(p->mm, 0, TASK_SIZE, &hwpoison_walk_ops,
 			      (void *)&priv);
 	if (ret == 1 && priv.tk.addr)
 		kill_proc(&priv.tk, pfn, flags);
-- 
2.41.0.255.g8b1d071c50-goog