linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] drm: add documentation for drm_buddy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2023 06:25:42 +0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Christian König 
        <christian.koenig@....com>, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>,
        Nikolai Kondrashov <spbnick@...il.com>,
        Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Arthur Grillo <arthurgrillo@...eup.net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, mauro.chehab@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] drm: add documentation for drm_buddy_test kUnit
 test

Em Wed, 12 Jul 2023 18:03:00 +0300
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com> escreveu:

> On Wed, 12 Jul 2023, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org> wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
> > index 09ee6f6af896..dd6c5afd6cd6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
> > @@ -737,6 +737,18 @@ static int drm_buddy_suite_init(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * KTEST_SUITE: set of tests for drm buddy alloc
> > + * Scope: drm subsystem
> > + * Mega feature: drm
> > + * Feature: buddy_alloc
> > + *
> > + * KTEST_TEST: drm_test_buddy_alloc_%s
> > + * Description: Run DRM buddy allocation %arg[1] test
> > + *
> > + * arg[1].values: limit, range, optimistic, smoke, pathological
> > + */
> > +  
> 
> "/**" indicates a kernel-doc comment, and this is not a kernel-doc
> comment.
> 
> $ scripts/kernel-doc -none drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c 
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c:752: warning: cannot understand
> function prototype: 'struct kunit_case drm_buddy_tests[] = '
> 
> Nowadays kernel-doc is part of W=1 builds.

True. I already told it at patch 0. I opted to not add a patch for it on this
RFC series, to make it simpler. A simple logic at kernel-doc is enough to 
tell its state machine to ignore blocks that contain the KTEST_\w+: pattern:

diff --git a/scripts/kernel-doc b/scripts/kernel-doc
index d0116c6939dc..bf386460691f 100755
--- a/scripts/kernel-doc
+++ b/scripts/kernel-doc
@@ -259,6 +259,7 @@ my $doc_sect = $doc_com .
     '\s*(\@[.\w]+|\@\.\.\.|description|context|returns?|notes?|examples?)\s*:([^:].*)?$';
 my $doc_content = $doc_com_body . '(.*)';
 my $doc_block = $doc_com . 'DOC:\s*(.*)?';
+my $ktest_block = $doc_com . 'KTEST_\w+:\s*(.*)?';
 my $doc_inline_start = '^\s*/\*\*\s*$';
 my $doc_inline_sect = '\s*\*\s*(@\s*[\w][\w\.]*\s*):(.*)';
 my $doc_inline_end = '^\s*\*/\s*$';
@@ -2015,6 +2016,10 @@ sub process_name($$) {
     my $file = shift;
     my $descr;
 
+    if (/$ktest_block/o) {
+	$state = STATE_NORMAL;
+	return;
+    }
     if (/$doc_block/o) {
 	$state = STATE_DOCBLOCK;
 	$contents = "";



Thanks,
Mauro