linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Set only the PTE_DIRTY bit while preserving the HW dirty state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:17:06 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Set only the PTE_DIRTY bit while preserving the
 HW dirty state

On 13.07.23 09:15, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> pte_mkdirty() creates dirty states both in SW and HW bits, which is really
> not required, either in pte_wrprotect() or pte_modify() for preserving the
> HW dirty state. Because pte_mkdirty() sets PTE_DIRTY and clears PTE_RDONLY
> as pte_write() always evaluates to be true - otherwise pte_hw_dirty() will
> not test out in the first place. Clearing PTE_RDONLY again is not required
> here because the pte is already in pte_hw_dirty() but might soon loose its
> dirty state thus requiring preservation in SW dirty bit i.e PTE_DIRTY.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> ---
> This applies on v6.5-rc1
> 
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 5 +++--
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 0bd18de9fd97..171d6d7f8087 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static inline pte_t pte_wrprotect(pte_t pte)
>   	 * clear), set the PTE_DIRTY bit.
>   	 */
>   	if (pte_hw_dirty(pte))
> -		pte = pte_mkdirty(pte);
> +		pte = set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_DIRTY));
>   
>   	pte = clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_WRITE));
>   	pte = set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_RDONLY));
> @@ -823,7 +823,8 @@ static inline pte_t pte_modify(pte_t pte, pgprot_t newprot)
>   			      PTE_ATTRINDX_MASK;
>   	/* preserve the hardware dirty information */
>   	if (pte_hw_dirty(pte))
> -		pte = pte_mkdirty(pte);
> +		pte = set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_DIRTY));
> +
>   	pte_val(pte) = (pte_val(pte) & ~mask) | (pgprot_val(newprot) & mask);
>   	return pte;
>   }

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb