linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Set only the PTE_DIRTY bit while preserving the HW dirty state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 Jul 2023 11:23:37 -0700
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, david@...hat.com,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/mm: Set only the PTE_DIRTY bit while preserving
 the HW dirty state

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 12:45:18PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> pte_mkdirty() creates dirty states both in SW and HW bits, which is really
> not required, either in pte_wrprotect() or pte_modify() for preserving the
> HW dirty state. Because pte_mkdirty() sets PTE_DIRTY and clears PTE_RDONLY
> as pte_write() always evaluates to be true - otherwise pte_hw_dirty() will
> not test out in the first place. Clearing PTE_RDONLY again is not required
> here because the pte is already in pte_hw_dirty() but might soon loose its
> dirty state thus requiring preservation in SW dirty bit i.e PTE_DIRTY.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>