[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d8f60e51-2d62-4370-9032-51eda744239d@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 13:30:04 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, kernel@...electronics.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 11:03:28AM +0200, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:
> This patch makes the use of IRQ optional to make the DA9061/62 usable
> for designs that don't have the IRQ pin connected, because the regulator
> is usable without IRQ.
Are there any dependencies for this patch? The fact that I acked it
makes me think there were MFD parts
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303082246.GuLdPL0t-lkp@intel.com/
I really doubt that the LKP bot ran into an issue due to a system with
this device without an IRQ wired up...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists