[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9629970cc2c3452e83a43660823319e5@dh-electronics.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 15:36:38 +0000
From: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
kernel <kernel@...electronics.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V5] regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional
From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@...nel.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2023 2:30 PM
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 11:03:28AM +0200, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:
>
>> This patch makes the use of IRQ optional to make the DA9061/62 usable
>> for designs that don't have the IRQ pin connected, because the regulator
>> is usable without IRQ.
>
> Are there any dependencies for this patch? The fact that I acked it
> makes me think there were MFD parts
It's a patch series. This patch is the last one in this series, that is
missing to have the ability to run the DA9061/62 without a connected IRQ
pin. The other patches are already upstreamed and yes there are MFD parts,
see below:
1: commit 7ef5c57758c4 ("dt-bindings: mfd: da9062: Move IRQ to optional properties")
2: commit 7d61f6313e90 ("mfd: da9062: Use MFD_CELL_OF macro")
3: commit c923d5001ba0 ("mfd: da9062: Remove IRQ requirement")
4: This patch ("regulator: da9062: Make the use of IRQ optional")
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303082246.GuLdPL0t-lkp@intel.com/
>
> I really doubt that the LKP bot ran into an issue due to a system with
> this device without an IRQ wired up...
In V3 of this patch the kernel test robot found an issue. I had really
overlooked that. Thanks to LKP. I forgot to replace the irq variable in
the function devm_request_threaded_irq(). So it affected the path with
IRQ. In V4 I fixed that. In V5 I only rebased it on the current next
20230713 and add Marek's Reviewed-by tag.
Regards
Christoph
Powered by blists - more mailing lists