[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <479a1704-a383-4385-a6d5-773cbfe1d4c8@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 17:11:55 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/9] selftests/mm: Give scripts execute permission
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 04:00:58PM +0000, SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 10:44:14 +0100 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com> wrote:
> > Personally I'd rather keep this patch and try rather than proactively do a work
> > around.
> I don't have a strong opinion here, as mentioned before. That said, I feel it
> would be good to have a clear agreement or explanation about that, since I got
> similar situation before[1].
I think just from a usability point of view we want to end up with
things people are expected to execute actually executable.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists