linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/9] selftests/mm: Give scripts execute permission

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Jul 2023 17:11:55 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
        "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/9] selftests/mm: Give scripts execute permission

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 04:00:58PM +0000, SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 10:44:14 +0100 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com> wrote:

> > Personally I'd rather keep this patch and try rather than proactively do a work
> > around.

> I don't have a strong opinion here, as mentioned before.  That said, I feel it
> would be good to have a clear agreement or explanation about that, since I got
> similar situation before[1].

I think just from a usability point of view we want to end up with
things people are expected to execute actually executable.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)