linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/9] selftests/mm: Give scripts execute permission

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230714092600.5cdf5844098a2de728a1750b@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jul 2023 09:26:00 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
Cc:     SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
        "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/9] selftests/mm: Give scripts execute permission

On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 10:44:14 +0100 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com> wrote:

> Thanks for the detailed explanation. Are you effectively saying this patch will
> turn into a no-op once its been munged through the various patch management
> tools? That's disappointing because it's a pain to have to invoke everything
> though bash explicitly. Many other scripts manage to have the correct execute
> permission set (see everything in ./scripts for example).

Such patches need delicate handling :(

I queued this as a standalone thing, for 6.5-rcx.