[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5336c2a4-aaf7-4bc0-46ec-dd1ae15bbf85@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 17:28:05 +0100
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/9] selftests/mm: Give scripts execute permission
On 14/07/2023 17:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 10:44:14 +0100 Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the detailed explanation. Are you effectively saying this patch will
>> turn into a no-op once its been munged through the various patch management
>> tools? That's disappointing because it's a pain to have to invoke everything
>> though bash explicitly. Many other scripts manage to have the correct execute
>> permission set (see everything in ./scripts for example).
>
> Such patches need delicate handling :(
>
> I queued this as a standalone thing, for 6.5-rcx.
That's great - thanks Andrew! Do I'll drop this patch for my v2 of the series
(hopefully Monday).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists