[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230714215113.3919026-1-trix@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 17:51:13 -0400
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] shmem: set variable shmem_mark_dquot_dirty and shmem_dquot_write_info storage-class-specifier to static
smatch reports
mm/shmem_quota.c:318:5: warning: symbol 'shmem_mark_dquot_dirty'
was not declared. Should it be static?
mm/shmem_quota.c:323:5: warning: symbol 'shmem_dquot_write_info'
was not declared. Should it be static?
These variables are only used in their defining file, so it should be static.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
---
mm/shmem_quota.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/shmem_quota.c b/mm/shmem_quota.c
index e349c0901bce..062d1c1097ae 100644
--- a/mm/shmem_quota.c
+++ b/mm/shmem_quota.c
@@ -315,12 +315,12 @@ static int shmem_release_dquot(struct dquot *dquot)
return 0;
}
-int shmem_mark_dquot_dirty(struct dquot *dquot)
+static int shmem_mark_dquot_dirty(struct dquot *dquot)
{
return 0;
}
-int shmem_dquot_write_info(struct super_block *sb, int type)
+static int shmem_dquot_write_info(struct super_block *sb, int type)
{
return 0;
}
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists