linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: Add VDD_CX to GPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZLVyvHnKPdOfqAck@gerhold.net>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:56:28 +0200
From:   Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115: Add VDD_CX to GPU_CCC

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 06:50:18PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 17.07.2023 18:28, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 05:19:22PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >> The GPU_CC block is powered by VDD_CX. Describe that.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi | 2 ++
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
> >> index 29b5b388cd94..bfaaa1801a4d 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi
> >> @@ -1430,6 +1430,8 @@ gpucc: clock-controller@...0000 {
> >>  			clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>,
> >>  				 <&gcc GCC_GPU_GPLL0_CLK_SRC>,
> >>  				 <&gcc GCC_GPU_GPLL0_DIV_CLK_SRC>;
> >> +			power-domains = <&rpmpd SM6115_VDDCX>;
> >> +			required-opps = <&rpmpd_opp_low_svs>;
> > 
> > Where is this required-opp coming from? The clocks in gpucc seem to have
> > different voltage requirements depending on the rates, but we usually
> > handle that in the OPP tables of the consumer.
> The only lower levels defined for this SoC are VDD_MIN and VDD_RET,
> but quite obviously the GPU won't work then
> 

The levels needed for the GPU clocks to run should be in the GPU OPP
table though, just like e.g. sdhc2_opp_table for the SDCC clocks.

I still don't really understand why this is specified here. :)

Stephan