[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e57e5d8efc3107b5f2c4e66492650b9d0c17b898.camel@siemens.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 06:24:00 +0000
From: "Li, Hua Qian" <HuaQian.Li@...mens.com>
To: "wim@...ux-watchdog.org" <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
"linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: "kristo@...nel.org" <kristo@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"huaqianlee@...il.com" <huaqianlee@...il.com>,
"nm@...com" <nm@...com>, "vigneshr@...com" <vigneshr@...com>,
"Kiszka, Jan" <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Su, Bao Cheng" <baocheng.su@...mens.com>,
"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for WDIOF_CARDRESET on TI AM65x
On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 08:16 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/07/2023 06:07, huaqian.li@...mens.com wrote:
> > From: Li Hua Qian <huaqian.li@...mens.com>
> >
> > The watchdog hardware of TI AM65X platform does not support
> > WDIOF_CARDRESET feature, add a reserved memory to save the watchdog
> > reset cause, to know if the board reboot is due to a watchdog
> > reset.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Hua Qian <huaqian.li@...mens.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Fix the coding style.
> > - Add usage note for the reserved memory.
> > - Link to v3:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-watchdog/20230713095127.1230109-1-huaqian.li@siemens.com
>
> Much more changed. You added example in the bindings which no one
> asked
> for. Then you added multiple fake review tags to all the patches.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Hi,
Sorry for the wrong statement. I missed some key information and
missunderstood `Reviewed-by`, I treated `Reviewed-by` as `Who
has reviewed`.
Best regards,
Li Hua Qian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists